Tag Archives: innovation

exploring contemporary educational goals

Managing digital repositories

Digitool, an existing digital repository that is available through the University Library is currently being trialled.  Initially it will be used to store and catalogue a range of digital resources around the teaching themes for use in BIOSCI100 & 100G. The Dublin core is used to standardise the metadata descriptors. In designing the digital repository, the team is mindful of issues around copyright and access.  The project will investigate the potential of this repository as a teaching resource and the practicality of maintaining and building on such a system in the longer term.  It will also consider the long term costs for investment in such a system and likely usage by the staff within the School of Biological Sciences.

Continue reading

eTools for assessment and feedback

Massey University academics present on essay type assessment marking. Their research indicates that:
Lecturers prefer to mark assignments on paper rather than on screen depending on the type of assignments. For especially long essays, paper based reading and marking is preferred.
Specialist software such as Electronic feedback, Grademark, WebCT connect, MarkTool, Creative technology-Markin, Markers assistant, Penmarked or basic tools such as Track changes function on Microsoft Word were being used by some lecturers to mark assignments electronically.
Feedback was the most important aspect of assignments. Comment banks could be developed to provide detailed feedback for each of the assignments.

Good feedback practice (Nicol & Macfarlane‐Dick, 2006):
1. helps clarify what good performance is (goals, criteria, expected standards);
2. facilitates the development of self-assessment (reflection) in learning;
3. delivers high quality information to students about their learning;
4. encourages teacher and peer dialogue around learning;
5. encourages positive motivational beliefs and self-esteem;
6. provides opportunities to close the gap between current and desired performance;
7. provides information to teachers that can be used to help shape teaching.

Continue reading

Good teaching in large classes

In this seminar, experienced teachers of large classes shared their strategies for keeping their classes active and engaging. It’s not about the tools, but how you use them to meet the needs of your learners, staying true to your teaching approach.

References:

McKeachie, W. (1980). Improving lectures by understanding students’ information processing. In McKeachie, W.J. (Ed.), Learning, Cognition, and College Teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 2. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Learning spaces e-book by EDUCAUSE
Good, M. (2001). On the Way to Online Pedagogy (Chapter 13) in John Stephenson (ed.). Teaching and Learning Online: Pedagogies for New Technologies. [Online]
Lyman, F. (1981). The Responsive Class Discussion. In A. S. Anderson (ed.), Mainstreaming Digest. College Park: College of Education, University of Maryland, 1981. (Think-pair-share technique)
Thiagi, S. (2005). Thiagi’s Interactive lectures: Power up your training with interative games and exercises. USA: ASTD Press.
George Brown (1978). Lecturing and Explaining. London: Methuen. (Peer squares-peer assessment technique)
Shenk, D. (1997) Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut, San Francisco: HarperCollins.  

Continue reading